![]() ![]() By default, CDS is configured to run only one "thread" to read the sources and two "threads" to extract the content. " The indexing options are configured for an average desktop computer. I also complained about speed issues and I applied this message from Max L. Is the Trial the cause? I was sure I read it was fully functional. Is this all that the software is capable of or is there something I am doing wrong? I did buy a license for use on my bosses computer but I am running this specific install as a Trial before committing to it. I see that Copernic will use at most 10-15% of the CPU and memory is 15GB used of 144GB. I went through every performance setting and also it is running in unrestricted mode. Its been almost a week of Copernic running and it has been indexing the PST files so far and it has only made it to 140k index. Initially I loaded the entire system drives (C:) but since it was taking so long I only included the C:\users folder from each system (about 1.5mil files) and loaded 150GB across 20 PST files. 2 x hard drives setup as RAID 0 specifically for this data to double read/writeĬopernic im finding very slow on the index, pretty much the same as on a mid range laptop. TWO (2) x Intel Xeon CPU E5620 2.40GHz (4 cores each cpu/8 total/16 total logical) This is much more capable than then desktop and the laptop I was using before. ![]() I just recently tried Autopsy, really nice but no search operators and it seems to have overworked the external drive and broke it (lol).ĭue to all these issues I transferred all the data to one of my physical Lab server which is an old Dell Poweredge 710 server. I have tried a handful of them out there free/open or as trials but all of them have had issues with speed or not able to perform searches as it has been requested. I probably should have gone for two Neo Find licenses for $40, but I was too lazy to trial Neo Find to make sure it wasn't missing something I'd need, so I just bought the Pro license.I have been tasked over the last several months to do a major search and to find the right program to do it. They also have a Neo Find product, which is some sort of subset of Neo Pro for $20 for one machine. In the end I decided that all I really wanted was the Neo product on two machines, so $50 once was better than $60 a year for me. I sprung for the standard $50 license, which is good for two machines, but they also have a subscription model that I was surprised to find tempting - $5 a month for all their products on all your machines. They have a generous trial (I forget how long it was, but it was more than 30 days). So if you're in the same boat as me (file system searches aren't a problem, but Outlook/Exchange searches are), take a look at Neo Pro. The ugly interface doesn't bother me much since I can now find what I'm looking for instantly. I don't do much mailbox organization - I'll stash messages that I *know* I'll need later - like purchase receipts and such - into appropriate folders, but general conversation threads and most other email typically just stays in my inbox.īut Outlook's built-in search is awful, so I sprung for Neo (Nelson E-Mail Organizer) Pro, which has been a major improvement even if its interface is clunky. However, I use Outlook for email, both at home and at work, and I had major problems finding things there. I don't have too much trouble finding files on my file system since a name search usually nets me what I want and XYplorer does a fine job with that. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |